PRINT EDITION

Let Indians Decide: How Restricting Border Passage by Blood Quantum Infringes on Tribal Sovereignty

By March 1, 2021July 22nd, 2022No Comments

Abstract: American immigration laws have been explicitly racial throughout most of the country’s history. For decades, only White foreign nationals could become naturalized citizens. All racial criteria have since vanished from the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)—all but one. Section 289 of the INA allows “American Indians born in Canada” to freely cross into the United States if they possess at least 50% blood “of the American Indian race.” Such American Indians cannot be prohibited from entering the United States and can obtain lawful permanent residence status—if they meet the blood quantum requirement. Such racialized immigration controls arbitrarily restrict cross-border Indigenous communities and have since their inception in the mid-1800s.
Indigenous communities were never confined within national borders prior to colonization, and they continue to span both the U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico borders. The free passage of these individuals is restricted by INA section 289. This Comment focuses on how the question of who is “Indian” should be defined not by the federal government based on blood quantum, but by Indigenous nations themselves. Ultimately, this Comment argues that Congress should remove the blood quantum requirement entirely and expand the free passage right to include American Indians born in Mexico.

Download the Full Article

Other Articles from WLR Print Edition

June 1, 2026 in PRINT EDITION

After Advisory Votes: Exploring Alternatives for Voter Engagement in Washington Tax Policy

Abstract: In 2023, the Washington State legislature repealed the state’s advisory vote system, which allowed taxpayers to express their opinions on enacted tax measures. This system was the first of…
Read More
June 1, 2026 in PRINT EDITION

Deaf in Prison: The Courts’ Failure to Remedy ADA Violations in Prisons

Abstract: The carceral system is one of the many institutions that fails to adequately accommodate individuals with disabilities. D/deaf individuals specifically face a severe lack of resources and accommodations, pervasive…
Read More
June 1, 2026 in PRINT EDITION

“Speech Swept Up”—The Constitutionality of State Prohibitions of Conversion Therapy for LGBTQ+ Youth

Abstract: Since 2012, individual states have passed laws prohibiting state-licensed mental health professionals from engaging in conversion therapy with minor clients. Despite the breadth of research undermining its efficacy and…
Read More