Skip to main content
PRINT EDITION

Wrongful Improvers as a Guiding Principle for Application of the FTC’s IP Deletion Requirement

By December 1, 2022January 17th, 2023No Comments

Abstract: The 2021 Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigation into cloud storage app developer Everalbum resulted in a consent decree that required Everalbum to delete not only unlawfully collected data, but also algorithms created using that data. The FTC had imposed this kind of penalty only once before. Questions remain about how the FTC will apply this so-called intellectual property (IP) deletion requirement in the future. This Comment argues that situations where companies develop intellectual property from misappropriated consumer data are analogous to cases where courts seek to apply the property law rule of the wrongful improver, i.e., where one party knowingly improves another’s property. The rule requires that courts grant title to the owner of the original property regardless of how much the value of the property has increased. Applying the wrongful improver rule can guide the FTC’s future application of the IP deletion requirement in two ways. First, application of the rule suggests that the IP deletion requirement should apply regardless of what type of data (biometric or non-biometric) has been misappropriated. Second, the rule indicates that a company must forfeit not only rights to their particular copy of their IP, but also all the IP rights that attach to it. Application of this rule will thereby strengthen the FTC’s power to punish offenders and more significantly deter companies from unlawfully collecting consumer data.

Download the Full Article

Other Articles from WLR Print Edition

March 1, 2024 in PRINT EDITION

Preempting Private Prisons

Abstract: In 2019 and 2021, respectively, California and Washington enacted laws banning the operation of private prisons within each state, including those operated by private companies in contracts with the…
Read More
March 1, 2024 in PRINT EDITION

Speaking Back to Sexual Privacy Invasions

Abstract: Many big players in the internet ecosystem do not like hosting sexual expression. They often justify these bans as a protection of sexual privacy. For example, Meta states that…
Read More
March 1, 2024 in PRINT EDITION

From Precedent to Policy: The Effects of Dobbs on Detained Immigrant Youth

Abstract: In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court released the historic decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, holding that the U.S. Constitution does not protect an individual’s right to an…
Read More