Skip to main content
ONLINE EDITION

A Loophole in the Fourth Amendment: The Government’s Unregulated Purchase of Intimate Health Data

By January 1, 2024February 25th, 2024No Comments

Abstract: Companies use everyday applications and personal devices to collect deeply personal information about a user’s body and health. While this “intimate health data” includes seemingly innocuous information about fitness activities and basic vitals, it also includes extremely private information about the user’s health, such as chronic conditions and reproductive health. However, consumers have no established rights over the intimate health data shared on their devices. Believing that these technologies are created for their benefit, consumers hand over the most intimate aspects of their lives through health-related applications relying on the promise that their data will remain private. Today, the intimate health data of unaware consumers is collected and sold to third-party data brokers who then repackage the data, label it, and sell it to the highest bidder: advertisers, corporations, and most concerning of all—the government and law enforcement agencies. This ability for governmental entities to simply purchase intimate health data from thirdparty data brokers violates the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

To discourage the overreach of arbitrary law enforcement, the Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Without a warrant, governmental entities may purchase intimate health data from third-party data brokers, constituting an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. This Comment examines the use of third-party data brokers by government agencies to collect and analyze intimate health data. In doing so, this Comment advocates for greater accountability in government data collection practices and proposes legislative solutions to regulating the government’s purchase of intimate health data.

DOWNLOAD THE FULL ARTICLE

Other Articles from WLR Online

January 5, 2026 in BLOG POST, ONLINE EDITION

From the Crag to the Capital: How the PARC Act Shapes Climbing Access

Shot on 35mm film by Margaret Szeles in Fall 2025 at a sport climbing area in the Pacific Northwest. Roots of American Rock Climbing From “the original dirtbag” Fred Beckey…
Read More
January 1, 2026 in ONLINE EDITION

Time as a Constitutional Constraint: Resolving the Circuit Split on Prolonged Fourth Amendment

Abstract: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, “he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall…
Read More
June 1, 2025 in BLOG POST, ONLINE EDITION

A Dormant (Commerce Clause) Challenge to Washington’s Green Energy Laws?

States have often been the incubators for “novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country,” as long as courts do not cut down these statutes.…
Read More
June 1, 2025 in Essay, ONLINE EDITION

Facial Recognition Technology and Wrongful Arrests in the Digital Policing Era

Abstract: This Essay examines the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) by law enforcement agencies, the implications of such use, and the disproportionate impact the use has on Black, Indigenous,…
Read More