Skip to main content
PRINT EDITION

Marital Disharmony: Examining the Adverse Spousal Testimonial Privilege and Its Impact in Washington State

Abstract: In Washington State, RCW 5.60.060(1) provides that “[a] spouse or domestic partner shall not be examined for or against his or her spouse or domestic partner, without the consent of the spouse or domestic partner.” This evidence rule, known as the adverse spousal testimonial privilege, allows a defendant to exclude witness testimony by their spouse under most circumstances. A product of common law tradition, this privilege stems from a time when the law treated women as chattel with no independent legal rights. Since Washington State codified the adverse spousal privilege, the United States Supreme Court amended the federal spousal testimonial privilege by vesting the power to determine whether to testify or not in the witness-spouse. That is, a witness-spouse may choose not to testify against the defendant- spouse, but the defendant-spouse cannot prevent the witness-spouse from willingly testifying. After this landmark decision, most states followed suit and amended their evidentiary rules to reflect the federal standard. However, Washington State remains one of four states that still retains the common law tradition as it once was, allowing the defendant-spouse to prevent spousal testimony (with a few specific exceptions). This Comment contrasts the evolution of the adverse testimonial privilege at the federal level with Washington State. It examines how Washington courts are slowly chipping away at the edges of this statutory privilege in the absence of legislative action. This Comment argues that despite legislative efforts to modernize the privilege by creating certain exceptions, the Washington rule remains overly burdensome for testifying witness-spouses to overcome and perpetuates historical inequities for women, who are often the witnesses and victims of their husband’s crimes. Finally, this Comment recommends that the Washington State Legislature follow federal precedent and vest the privilege solely in the witness-spouse.

Download the Full Article

Other Articles from WLR Print Edition

April 1, 2026 in PRINT EDITION

Beyond Equality to Belonging: The Missing Value in Equal Protection Law Involving Education

Abstract: Belonging is a fundamental need without which people cannot function optimally. Accordingly, school belonging—students’ perceptions of mattering or feeling cared about, accepted, respected and valued by faculty, staff, and…
Read More
April 1, 2026 in PRINT EDITION

Still a Picture, Not a Life: Scrutinizing Media in Federal Court

Abstract: Before COVID-19, federal judges largely resisted cameras in their courtrooms; during it, they used webcams to hold court. The American legal system is designed for in-person interaction, yet cases…
Read More
April 1, 2026 in PRINT EDITION

Comparative Judicial Enforcement

Abstract: Almost immediately upon his second inauguration, President Trump took several actions that subvert longstanding norms, contravene long-settled Supreme Court precedent, and disrespect the authority of the coordinate branches to…
Read More