Skip to main content
PRINT EDITION

My Cash Is My Bond: Recognizing Rights to Cash Bail Forfeiture Exoneration in Washington

By March 1, 2021July 22nd, 2022No Comments

Abstract: When criminal defendants fail to appear for a court date after they are released on a bail bond or cash bail, Washington courts will likely forfeit their bail. And when the defendant reappears—whether a day, a month, or a year later—that same court might return, or “exonerate,” the bail bond or cash bail.

But Washington does not treat cash bail and bail bonds similarly in the context of forfeiture exoneration. Commercial bail bond agents enjoy robust statutory and judicial avenues for the return of their forfeited bail bonds. A little over one-hundred years ago, the Supreme Court of Washington treated cash bail similarly to bail bonds when deciding whether to exonerate forfeited bail. Lower Washington appellate courts appear to be forgetting that precedent today. As such, cash bail depositors—the accused’s loved ones, community bail funds, or the accused themselves—have increasingly been left to the whims of trial courts while bail bond agents have gained stronger exoneration rights.

Reform to cash bail forfeiture exoneration in Washington is overdue. The well-known socioeconomic and racial inequities of bail leave their mark on failures to appear and, thus, bail forfeiture. Further, cash bail forfeiture exoneration may become more critical as Washington reckons with a “third wave” of bail reform and reformers urge a move away from commercial bail bonds and toward community bail funds.

Washington should exonerate bail bonds and cash bail similarly. This Comment urges the Washington Legislature to enact certain statutory rights to cash bail exoneration. It further encourages Washington courts to realign cash bail forfeiture exoneration practices with precedent and to recognize the right to cash bail forfeiture exoneration whenever defendants reappear within sixty days.

Download the Full Article

Other Articles from WLR Print Edition

December 1, 2023 in PRINT EDITION

A Good Death: End-of-Life Lawyering Through a Relational Autonomy Lens

Abstract: Death is difficult—even for lawyers who counsel clients on end-of-life planning. The predominant approach to counseling clients about death relies too heavily on traditional notions of personal autonomy and…
Read More
December 1, 2023 in PRINT EDITION

Surprises in the Skies: Resolving the Circuit Split on How Courts Should Determine Whether an “Accident” is “Unexpected or Unusual” Under the Montreal Convention

Abstract: Article 17 of both the Montreal Convention and its predecessor, the Warsaw Convention, imposes liability onto air carriers for certain injuries and damages from “accidents” incurred by passengers during…
Read More
December 1, 2023 in PRINT EDITION

Following the Science: Judicial Review of Climate Science

Abstract: Climate change is the greatest existential crisis of our time. Yet, to date, Congress has failed to enact the broad-sweeping policies required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the…
Read More